Dodox Audit
A complete read of how AI answers for your category, and the plan that gets you named.
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
Grok
Perplexity49
Buyer prompts
5
AI engines
1
Full audit report
5d
Turnaround
AI already answers. The Audit shows who gets named, why, and what moves you onto the list.
01
They ask who to buy from. The model answers with a shortlist.
02
Competitors own the recommendation. You don't show up.
03
Why they win, why you don't, and the next pages and sources that move you onto the list.
Scores, who wins instead, why their pages get cited, why yours don't, and what to publish next.
Same 49 prompts across the major engines. Mention rate and position, side by side.
The rivals that take your slot, and the prompts they win.
The content angles and strategy models reward in your category.
Alignment gaps, missing answer shapes, and trust signals models skip when they read you.
The next pieces to ship, sources worth winning, and a ranked backlog across site, content, and authority.
Site, content, and authority. We dig into all three, then rank what closes the gap.
Crawl, schema, entity clarity so models can learn clean facts about you.
Why current pages miss citations, which competitor angles win, and the next pieces that fill the gap.
Third-party sources models already cite, and which trust signals to capture next.
Four steps. 5 days once prompts are locked.
Site, competitors, market. We lock the 49-prompt set with you.
Live answers across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and Perplexity, plus content and citation review.
Ranked fixes across site, content, authority footprint: pages to change, pieces to publish, sources to pursue.
Evidence, scores, and the ordered backlog in 5 days.
49 prompts across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and Perplexity. Typical turnaround 5 days once prompts are locked.
Dodox Audit
US & worldwide
AI visibility audit + prioritized change backlog. No retainer required.
$99 one-time. 49 prompts, full audit, 5 days turnaround.
A Dodox Audit is a dated standing across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and Perplexity on 49 buyer prompts: who gets named, who wins instead, and the evidence behind each answer. You also get the full content and citation read, why your pages miss and theirs win, trust signals still open to you, the next pieces to publish, and a ranked backlog across site, content, and authority. Price is $99 one-time for US & worldwide.
One Audit is $99 (one-time) for US & worldwide. Same scope everywhere: 49 prompts, content and citation analysis, publish priorities, and a ranked backlog. Switch markets with the toggle in the pricing section if you bill from a different region.
We review your live pages and the content strategy behind them. We explain why those pages fail to earn citations today, and why rival pages win the same prompts. We flag alignment issues between how buyers ask and how you answer, name the trust signals worth capturing next, and list the few content pieces that close the gap with competitors right now. This is a publish plan tied to evidence, not a vague theme list.
Site work that blocks models from learning clean facts about you: crawl access, robots, discovery files like llms.txt, schema, and entity clarity. Content work: rewrites on pages that already exist, plus new answer-shaped pages for the prompts you lose. Authority work: the third-party sources models already cite in your category, and which ones are still open for you. Every item is ranked by impact so your team knows what to do first.
5 days once the brief and prompt set are locked. Scope is fixed at 49 prompts and the full content, citation, and authority analysis.
Site URL, competitors, market, and a shortlist of buyer prompts if you already have them. We can also propose the prompt set for your approval before the run.
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and Perplexity. Same prompt set across engines so gaps are comparable, not hand-wavy. Continuous multi-engine monitoring and retainers live on the platform and managed services.
Founders and marketing leads who want more than a score: why AI routes buyers to competitors, and the concrete content and authority moves that close the gap. Agencies that need white-label-only reports should use Snapshots instead.
